TFAP
Tokyo Forum For Analytic Philosophy
Program
TBA
Speaker: Adrian K. Yee
From: Lingnan University
URL: https://sites.google.com/site/adriankyee/
Abstract: TBA
Shared Thought and Communication
Speaker: Rachel Goodman
From: University of Illinois Chicago
URL: https://phil.uic.edu/profiles/goodman-rachel/
Abstract: On a Fregean view of communication, communication requires shared sense. On a Russellian view of communication, it requires only shared reference and fulfillment of what I will call transactional requirements. My first aim is to illustrate that the Fregean view is dialectically unstable: the Fregean must explain some failures of communication in terms of difference of sense, and others in terms of failure to meet transactional requirements, without an explanation of the difference. However, even among those who shy away from the Fregean view, hesitation to embrace a Russellian view is common, so my second aim is to ask whether this is justified. I do so by clarifying the relationship between Russellianism about communication and relationism about communication—a view which provides a third option. I’ll suggest a way to adjudicate between these views by clarifying a commitment shared by the Fregean and the relationist, but rejected by the Russellian. If this commitment is justified, then given the instability of the Fregean view, relationism is preferable. However, the upshot may rather be that traditional dissatisfaction with a Russellian view of communication is undermotivated.
Proximate and Ultimate Causation
Speaker: Yafeng Shan
From: Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
URL: https://www.shanyafeng.com/
Abstract: It has been over 60 years since Ernst Mayr famously argued for the distinction between proximate and ultimate causes in biology. In the following decades, Mayr’s proximate-ultimate distinction was well received within evolutionary biology and widely regarded as a major contribution to the philosophy of biology. Despite its enormous influence, there has been a persistent controversy on the distinction. It has been argued that the distinction is untenable. In addition, there have been complaints about the pragmatic value of the distinction in biological research. Some even suggest that the distinction should better be abandoned. In contrast, Mayr had consistently maintained the significance of the proximate-ultimate distinction in biology. There are also other attempts to defend the distinction. The talk will examine the debate by taking an integrated History and Philosophy of Science approach and argue for a functional approach to causal concepts in scientific practice.
TBA
Speaker: Emil Andersson
From: Uppsala University
URL: https://www.emilandersson.org/
Abstract: TBA
TBA
Speaker: Kiyohiro Sen
From: University of Tokyo
URL: https://www.senkiyohiro.com/home2
Abstract: TBA
TBA
Speaker: Maximilian Tegtmeier
From: National University of Singapore
URL: https://philpeople.org/profiles/maximilian-tegtmeyer
Abstract: TBA
Speaker: Krys Dolega
From: Center for Cognition and Neurosciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles
URL: https://www.krysdolega.xyz/about/
Abstract: TBA
TBA
Speaker: Joel van Fossen
From: Hosei University
URL: http://gis.hosei.ac.jp/cms/?professor=joel-van-fossen
Abstract: TBA
TBA
Speaker: Giada Fratantonio
From: Universities of Glasgow and Aberdeen
URL: http://giada-fratantonio.weebly.com/
Abstract: TBA
TBA
Speaker: Joshua Rowan Thorpe
From: Universities of Glasgow and Aberdeen
URL: https://www.joshuarowanthorpe.com/
Abstract: TBA
TBA
Speaker: Heng Ying
From: Hong Kong University
URL: https://philpeople.org/profiles/heng-ying
Abstract: TBA